Roku 3 vs Roku 4: Which Streaming Player Should You Get?

Roku 3 vs Roku 4

There are a lot of great streaming devices on the market, ranging from Roku to Apple TV to Chromecast to Amazon Fire TV to… you get the point. With so many options, it can be difficult to choose the best device for you. This becomes especially difficult when you consider the various models that each product line offers. Today, we’re going to look at one of the most popular devices, the Roku, and compare two of Roku’s most popular models, the Roku 3 and Roku 4. Keep reading for our full Roku 3 vs Roku 4 comparison.

Roku has a lot of different models on the market, so it’s understandable if you have become somewhat confused. The Roku 3 is perhaps the most popular model yet, with the Roku 4 following closely behind. We thought it would be helpful to compare Roku 3 vs 4 in detail to help you get a better idea of the key differences and pros/cons of each device. Let’s get started!


Roku 3 vs Roku 4: Features

Roku 3 features:

  • Over 2,000 channels to choose from
  • Watch in full 1080 HD
  • Voice search
  • Gaming enabled
  • Works on any TV with an HDMI port
  • Dual core processor
  • Quick and responsive
  • Intuitive and easy to use

Roku 4 features:

  • Over 2,500 channels to choose from
  • Watch in up to 4K resolution (4 times the resolution of full HD)
  • Voice search
  • Gaming enabled
  • Works on any TV with an HDMI port
  • Quad core processor and upgraded RAM
  • Quick and responsive
  • Intuitive and easy to use

As you can see here, the biggest difference Roku 3 and 4 is the 4K streaming ability on the Roku 4. If you’re not familiar with it, 4K is the best resolution you can get for watching your favorite content, offering 4x the resolution as found in standard HD (1080p). With that said, there is not a whole lot of 4K content yet, although some streaming services like Netflix and Amazon Prime are beginning to launch more investments in producing in 4K.


Roku 3 vs 4: Performance

As you can see, the Roku 4 has the upgraded quad core processor, as well as a significant upgrade in RAM. This upgraded hardware is mainly added to support 4K streaming, which is more resource-intensive. For everyday streaming (such as watching live TV on Roku) and in regards to the speed at which you can browse and launch videos, the two devices are fairly similar.

There have been a few Roku speed tests done comparing the Roku 3 and Roku 4, and for the most part, the conclusion has been that while some apps run a bit faster on the Roku 4, most run at about equivalent speeds on both devices.


Roku 3 vs Roku 4: Value

The Roku 3 is offered at a retail price of $99.99, although given that it’s an older device, it’s generally available for a bit less. The Roku 4 is priced at $129.99.

In terms of value, the two devices are both great choices. If you want 4K streaming, the Roku 4 is a must (4K compatibility is the biggest difference between Roku 3 and 4). If you don’t have a 4K TV and don’t plan to have one in the future, the Roku 3 is a better value at a lower price.


Roku 3 vs 4: Bottom Line

In the end, both the Roku 3 and Roku 4 are great devices. The Roku 3 remains one of the top-rated streaming devices, despite its age. Overall, the Roku 3 is generally our top recommendation, unless you specifically want the ability to stream in 4K.

Some folks may argue about the “future proof-ness” of the Roku 4, which is a valid point. Perhaps it would be wise to get a newer device that has a faster processor and 4K capabilities. However, consider this: if you do not currently have a 4K TV, if you ever get one in the future, it will most likely be a smart TV – which may just erase your need for a Roku device altogether. In fact, Roku technology is often implemented into smart TVs nowadays, with approximately 14% of smart TVs produced today offering Roku technology.

So, the bottom line is this: if you currently have a 4K TV, the Roku 4 is worth the upgrade. If you do not have a 4K TV, stick with the cheaper, older, but still lightning-fast Roku 3. Thanks for reading our comparison of the Roku 3 vs Roku 4, and have a great day!

Austin Meadows

Austin Meadows

Austin Meadows is a cord-cutting reporter living in the rainy but beautiful Pacific North West.
Disclosure: Streaming Observer is supported by readers. Articles may contain referral links. For more information, see the disclosure at the bottom of the page.
Austin Meadows

2 Comments on "Roku 3 vs Roku 4: Which Streaming Player Should You Get?"

  1. Mr Meadows you are the best. You tell it like it is plain , straight and simple. Love it. Thank you

  2. maurice hunley | June 5, 2017 at 12:09 am |

    I would love to have the roku 3&4

Comments are closed.